Careful Rick, reality may not be what you think it is...
May or may not be true - would require confirmation with an inline current test on the battery. More likely, it's a hard reset line to either the primary processor or an ancillary chip designed to manage power-on reset to the entire system. FAA computers are a long ways from embedded systems design.
@Rick F. And like I said, when you power up (cold boot) an embedded device like a TOMTOM, it pulls the battery charge level information from FLASH memory. In other words it shows you the last battery charge level data which it 'remembers' from before it was powered down, so you can not count on that info being accurate until after all high priority tasks are completed, which, on a GPS unit can take >3 minutes with good radio signals, possibly forever without (showing the correct battery charge display is less important than telling the customer where she is).
In other words, the battery charge level information you are seeing (and basing your statements on) may be an old reading, not a current (no pun intended) reading.
You are guaranteed to have some battery level depletion after a three month 'complete power down'! This is because of the capacitance loss due to the fact that the battery is not completely removed from the circuit. I can not explain this well, but your car battery circuitry works in a similar fashion. If you disconnect both battery terminals, your car battery can hold a charge for many months or possibly even years, versus when you turn off the ignition switch (assuming no loads, like a clock or RAM in the radio), there is no measurable current draw, yet the capacitive load (of the 'disconnected' devices) and the associated capacitive leakage, slowly eat away at the power in your battery, giving you weeks or a couple of months before the car will not start. The difference between these two is the effective size (and leakage) of the two capacitors, the first being the car's ignition system, and the second being the car/earth/etc.
I really want to help you understand all this, even though that is not what you think is going on...
@canderson - Thanks for the backup canderson. Sometimes it helps get a point across when you get another view of the same issue.