once they iron out the switch to the Linux file system from a Windows based file system.
Not that it matters at all to the post in question, but it did occur to me that they could and probably did go from the Microsoft FAT32 system to the native Linux system. Linux supports FAT32, but doesn't have to use it as has been the case until now. The only reason for using it before was to get the needed connectivity to a PC in "external disk / storage" mode. They certainly don't need that on the 1XXX and 2XXX units since there's no support for that anyway.No TomTom PND has ever been Windows OS based - Mike
MS sued, and one of the terms of the settlement was that Tomtom would stop using Fat32 within 2 years. App 10.x therefore can't use Fat32, and probably uses Linux ext2 (but we don't know).
The web based support needn't (whether it did or not is another story) have had anything to do with FAT32 at all. TomTom could still have written an application to talk to a Linux file system based TT connected by USB. It just wouldn't have looked the same to the PC (wouldn't have looked like a standard mass storage device as previous units have done).Good catch Mike. Perhaps TomTom's recent change to web-based support isn't about FAT32 at all. Then again, who knows? Maybe they're trying to sneak their iPhone app past Microsoft.
? Can you plug an iPhone into a Mac and have it show up as a FAT32 storage device? Guess what I'm asking .. what FAT32 on an iPhone? (Not an iPhone or iPhone/TT user, but surprised that it would use that).My guess is that Fat32 on the iPhone is covered by Apple's license.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.