I can confirm my new TopRam 4GB SDHC works well on my ONE XL-S.
I bought it on eBay from eTechIsland (kofkl) because nowhere could I find such a card of that capacity and speed in Montreal and came with a USB adapter at around 18$US before shipment thru "Buy it now" option.
Before installing the new card, I updated my XL-S thru TT Home with the latest quickfix and MapShare updates. Then I backed up. The card came formatted FAT32 and was empty. I restored the backup to my new card and it worked without a hitch. It seemed quicker in the bootup process and routing function although I did not measure the old timing vs the new.
When I reconnected, TT Home requested additional files to be downloaded to operate with the new inserted card. In the XL-S, adding a new SD card makes the internal memory disappear, it does not supplement the internal memory and one needs to copy the whole internal memory to the SD card as it will take over. Once connected to TT Home, with the SD card inserted, the internal memory becomes invisible.
I was curious as to the possible hype about the speed and did the following experiment. With the card is inserted in my XL-S, I copied a 100,431,872 Byte file to the SD card. It took about 2:40 for the complete copy operation. I deleted the file from the SD card and disconnected the GPS. I removed the SD card and inserted it in the supplied USB adapter and copied the same file to the SD card which took about 25 seconds or around 4MB/s writing. I then was curious about its read speed. I changed to an empty directory on my hard drive (Seagate ST3500630AS SATA) and copied the same file and it took 15 seconds to finish meaning over 6MB/sec reads. I agree it's not 22,5MB/sec writing for the SD card but surely faster than the internal memory of the XL-S. Depending on the internal interface of the XL-S to the SD card, it could theoretically load the system of 5,8MB under a second... Now remains the question of why the card is much slower when connected to the GPS than when connected straight to the USB adapter?
Hoping this will be useful to someone.
PS. One could argue that this card is an SD and not SDHC. From the ample reading I did, 4GB SD cards are rare and formatted FAT16 with large cluster size where the SDHC cards are all formatted FAT32 which was the case with my TopRam.
I bought it on eBay from eTechIsland (kofkl) because nowhere could I find such a card of that capacity and speed in Montreal and came with a USB adapter at around 18$US before shipment thru "Buy it now" option.
Before installing the new card, I updated my XL-S thru TT Home with the latest quickfix and MapShare updates. Then I backed up. The card came formatted FAT32 and was empty. I restored the backup to my new card and it worked without a hitch. It seemed quicker in the bootup process and routing function although I did not measure the old timing vs the new.
When I reconnected, TT Home requested additional files to be downloaded to operate with the new inserted card. In the XL-S, adding a new SD card makes the internal memory disappear, it does not supplement the internal memory and one needs to copy the whole internal memory to the SD card as it will take over. Once connected to TT Home, with the SD card inserted, the internal memory becomes invisible.
I was curious as to the possible hype about the speed and did the following experiment. With the card is inserted in my XL-S, I copied a 100,431,872 Byte file to the SD card. It took about 2:40 for the complete copy operation. I deleted the file from the SD card and disconnected the GPS. I removed the SD card and inserted it in the supplied USB adapter and copied the same file to the SD card which took about 25 seconds or around 4MB/s writing. I then was curious about its read speed. I changed to an empty directory on my hard drive (Seagate ST3500630AS SATA) and copied the same file and it took 15 seconds to finish meaning over 6MB/sec reads. I agree it's not 22,5MB/sec writing for the SD card but surely faster than the internal memory of the XL-S. Depending on the internal interface of the XL-S to the SD card, it could theoretically load the system of 5,8MB under a second... Now remains the question of why the card is much slower when connected to the GPS than when connected straight to the USB adapter?
Hoping this will be useful to someone.
PS. One could argue that this card is an SD and not SDHC. From the ample reading I did, 4GB SD cards are rare and formatted FAT16 with large cluster size where the SDHC cards are all formatted FAT32 which was the case with my TopRam.
Last edited: